which calcium reactor media
#1
Posted 02 July 2008 - 05:28 PM
can you experianced guys tell us what you choose and why.
cheers
ben
#2
Posted 02 July 2008 - 05:42 PM
ben, on Jul 2 2008, 06:28 PM, said:
can you experianced guys tell us what you choose and why.
cheers
ben
well i've used Arm mixed with grotech mag chips for the past year with no issue's,apart from a period where it wasn't putting out enough calcium in balance with kh,but after adding calc supplements for a month it sorted itself out.
reason i chose Arm, it takes less co2 to dissolve and supposed to have less phosphate than any other media,not sure how true that is though,on my next change i may go for a coral branch in the 1st chamber and Arm the 2nd.
#3
Posted 02 July 2008 - 05:58 PM
jed, on Jul 2 2008, 06:42 PM, said:
reason i chose Arm, it takes less co2 to dissolve and supposed to have less phosphate than any other media,not sure how true that is though,on my next change i may go for a coral branch in the 1st chamber and Arm the 2nd.
Brett
You say you have 2 reactors running, are they both linked to each other, any photos by any chance?
#4
Posted 02 July 2008 - 06:05 PM
#5
Posted 02 July 2008 - 06:17 PM
ben, on Jul 2 2008, 07:05 PM, said:
i've never managed to turn it to mush yet and i did start to run it quite hard until i upgraded to 2 reactors,i'll try and get a pic for you later although it won't be easy to see with the mess under my cabinet
pm'd a link for some media
#7
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:01 PM
Chris
#8
Posted 02 July 2008 - 08:02 PM
Would suggest you go for a pH controller, less to worry about and so much easier to set up.
NO LIVE ROCK WHATSOEVER
VORTECH MP40
2 x Tunze Nano
48 x 18 x 17.5 SUMP
NO LIVE ROCK IN HERE EITHER!
SCHURAN JETSKIM 150
SCHURAN JETSTREAM 1 Ca REACTOR
"GYRACTOR" running "BIO PEARLS"
EHEIM 1262 RETURN PUMP
FISH AND CORALS SUPPLIED BY
JASON's AQUATICS
#9
Posted 03 July 2008 - 10:00 PM
#10
Posted 03 July 2008 - 10:32 PM
And it comsumed 25 scoops of bio-calcium just to bring it up to 440ppm!
A question how do you work out how much mag chips to add?
#11
Posted 03 July 2008 - 11:25 PM
Andrew, on Jul 3 2008, 11:00 PM, said:
Andrew i think you mean 6.3 although i thought it was risky to go below 6.5
Tim, on Jul 3 2008, 11:32 PM, said:
And it comsumed 25 scoops of bio-calcium just to bring it up to 440ppm!
A question how do you work out how much mag chips to add?
sounds like a good excuse Tim
mag chips,you add about 10% of your overall media from memory
pic for tony of my reactors, although probably won't help much,the larger is a bit cloudy as i just moved it trying to get a better pic.
#12
Posted 04 July 2008 - 12:36 PM
I added about 90% of tub of the mag chips to my reactor!
#13
Posted 04 July 2008 - 02:05 PM
Chris
#14
Posted 04 July 2008 - 02:17 PM
#15
Posted 04 July 2008 - 02:45 PM
#16
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:09 AM

I can actually use just about any media in mine as i have adjustable flow for using finer fluidising medias etc, but the main reason i use the course stuff is that you can get some serious flow rate through it without it lifting up and clogging which is good from a chemistry point of veiw as it allows better diffusiuon of gas throughout the media, and its a more all encompassing media than any of the land based hydrocarbonate medias which are limited in other trace elements. In effect branch media redistributes nearly all the bound elements that corals use up, back into solution at the same levels they were taken up in the first place, so no need to worry about MG dosing or the vast majority of other elements as its all there ready to be dissolved back into solution at balanced levels (as long as you start off balanced in the first place)..
I think the limiting factor though with this media is that many reactors just dont have powerfull enough pumps on them to get the recirculation rates required to get the best from this type of media. If that were the case, i think we would see the end of products like arm etc as they would be pretty much defuct.
Regards
Si.
#17
Posted 14 July 2008 - 10:28 AM
ps, si you shouldnt leave your money lieing around like that , or the wife will get it,lol
#18
Posted 14 July 2008 - 10:54 AM
Its still worth getting a controler to be honest though Ben as this media does vary in its output with just small tweaks in pH....Im getting about 40+DkH at 6.45 and 40ml/min which seems to be about its best (most stable) setting. You can go down to as low as 6.2 if you push it, but the effluant then starts going slightly milky which screws up the readings.
that is a point woth noting actually as ive seen alot of people quote output readings whilst over running the reactor...ie unless the effluant is completely clear, chances are you are measuring both dissolved and particulates which is false...the dust doesnt do anything for your system as its not actually 'dissolved into solution at a chemical level, but a test kit doesnt know that....
regards
si.
#19
Posted 14 July 2008 - 12:03 PM
#20
Posted 14 July 2008 - 03:11 PM
so si, your saying the water in the reactor shouldnt become milky?

Help



















