kh now sorted , what next?
#1
Posted 09 August 2008 - 05:53 PM
the calcium just tested at 390.
im worried about putting the calcium reactor back on , as although the effluent was only comming out at 26, it was still causing my kh to rise.
i guess this means the tank isnt ready for a calcium reactor , unless i can run it slower?
what should my next step be?
cheers
ben
#2
Posted 09 August 2008 - 07:51 PM
i have my solenoid running on a timer - so adjust it accordingly - kH too high give it less time etc
#3
Posted 09 August 2008 - 08:59 PM
#4
Posted 09 August 2008 - 09:29 PM
Get a solenoid you can then run on a timer to switch your co2 on and off - you don't necessarily need a ph controller - does make it easier though.
mine runs for about 1 hour a day seems to be enough for my little tank.
I guess you could run it as is for say an 1 hour to start and then measure your effluent and take it from there to see what your tanks CO2 needs are?
#5
Posted 10 August 2008 - 08:27 AM
#6
Posted 10 August 2008 - 08:36 AM
Chris
#7
Posted 10 August 2008 - 08:52 AM
#8
Posted 10 August 2008 - 02:37 PM
#10
Posted 10 August 2008 - 03:39 PM
I've checked the spare ph controller that i've got and it's all working but would need a new ph probe, i'd prefer to sell it with the reactor but i'm sure we could do a deal if your interested!
#11
Posted 10 August 2008 - 04:05 PM
Got your Pm.
basically you could for the time being run the reactor at a slower rate (this is the good thing about reactors, you cant run them too low)..my advice would be to just leave the flow rate the same but drop back on the gas slightly (to raise the internal pH) at some point you'll come to a balance between what the system needs and what you are putting in.
In the mean time though, i would get hold of some calcium Chloride (turbo calcium) to boost your Ca back into balance.. If you get it upto around 425ppm and let your DkH drop to 8.0 you will then be back in balance.
then its just a case of turning the reactor back on and tinkering with the gas input untill your stable...it should stay in balance from that point.
I doubt very much you have an Mg issue as your obviously not struggling to get the DkH up to start with, but its worth testing anyway so you know where you are.
I always say this with reactors.....Get everything in balance first at NSW using seperate addatives if needs be .....DkH 8.0, Mg 1350ppm, Ca 425ppm and then play with the reactor...If its set up so that its not over running, you wont send anything out of balance....(media type allowing) It will all just go up or down in relation, dependant on whether your are adding more, or less than the system is taking up.
Regards
Si.
#12
Posted 10 August 2008 - 04:08 PM
#13
Posted 10 August 2008 - 04:22 PM
calcium 400
kh 8.6
mag 1110, i have been buffering mag , but its dropping faster than im used too, because of the larger % of sps than ive had before. i need to keep my eye on that
#14
Posted 10 August 2008 - 04:41 PM
#16
Posted 10 August 2008 - 06:22 PM
Its just about inevitable with any new substrate that you add to a system, that its surface will attract a certain amount of precipitation as the surface equalises at a chemical level to the water it is in. This is why i always soak new substrate that im adding to an existing system in old tank water for a couple of weeks first.
Regards
Si.
#18
Posted 11 August 2008 - 06:23 AM
Andrew, on Aug 10 2008, 04:39 PM, said:
I've checked the spare ph controller that i've got and it's all working but would need a new ph probe, i'd prefer to sell it with the reactor but i'm sure we could do a deal if your interested!
thanks m8, but yeh you would be better off selling it all as a kit. we can have a chat on frag night
#19
Posted 13 August 2008 - 12:46 PM
when i add the solenoid , will turning the co2 off at night help with this?
#20
Posted 13 August 2008 - 02:02 PM
some people use kalk overnight and use the cr during the day.
Im sure you will get more input on this shortly.

Help















