Whats a good Dkh reading
#1
Posted 10 September 2009 - 05:40 PM
Ive switched to a Salifert kit as i hear they are the best and my Dkh is higher than the previous test Kit. it used to read between 8 and 9
My readings are as follows
Ph 8.2
Calcium 420
Magnesium 1310
Dkh 11.5
Your comments would be much appreciated.
Rocky.
40x16x15 Cheato & DSB Sump
eheim 1262 return
Twin TMC V-skim 600's
2 x Seio m1500's and controller plus 2 x Seio m1100's
40Kg Fiji live rock
LPS and softies from Jasons Aquatics
Yellow,Powder blue & Regal Tangs,Convict Blennie, Pyjama wrasse, blue damsel and chromis
Blue leg & algae hermits, cerith, turbo,vibex and nassirus snails, and Linka
#2
Posted 10 September 2009 - 05:50 PM
Check out www.Reefpark.net if you have a minute
#3
Posted 10 September 2009 - 06:29 PM
#7
Posted 10 September 2009 - 07:18 PM
NO LIVE ROCK WHATSOEVER
VORTECH MP40
2 x Tunze Nano
48 x 18 x 17.5 SUMP
NO LIVE ROCK IN HERE EITHER!
SCHURAN JETSKIM 150
SCHURAN JETSTREAM 1 Ca REACTOR
"GYRACTOR" running "BIO PEARLS"
EHEIM 1262 RETURN PUMP
FISH AND CORALS SUPPLIED BY
JASON's AQUATICS
#8
Posted 11 September 2009 - 01:04 AM
Ive not seen any benefits of running higher levels of kh in the past and tbh no benefits of lower, Alk burn is often is asociated with high kh
does this not concern anybody.
Im not claiming this but sinse my kh has dropped to 7/8 from higher levels my die back has stopped completely, I did begin to wonder if excessive vodka dosing was to blame but maybe keeping kh levels at a more natural level or possibly correct levels suits acropora better.
Maybe a longevity test with reef tanks and associated kh levels might give some answers towards success .. just a thought
#9
Posted 11 September 2009 - 07:43 AM
In my old system my Dkh was most of the time kept at 11ish and i never had any problems with die back and all acros seemed well happy with well good growth .A lot of others guys are running theres well over NSW and they to have no problems and again good growth.
Myself i think maybe its a problem with the excessive carbon dosing
jas
#10
Posted 11 September 2009 - 08:07 AM
Like Tim, I've seen no difference in growth between running at around 8 dkh or 10+dkh for periods of several months.
Chris
#11
Posted 11 September 2009 - 09:02 AM
Quote
Its generally a recommendation based on the fact that in an enclosed system the effects of the biomass on pH values and the density of potential coral growth has a far greater effect on stability than that biomass would have on the surrounding water in the wild.
Having a slightly elevated level counters this effect.
Its not unusual for a great many systems to take up at least 1DkH per day without constant buffering, This has a knock on effect with pH stability allowing a wider and wider 24/7 drift rather than a consistant drift. Admitedly lagoons can be quite variable dependent on several factors, but the front reef and back reef areas arnt generally subject to such wide changes.
Its basically a case of accepting and countering the differences between small volume stability (our tanks) and large volume (the ocean).
#12
Posted 11 September 2009 - 01:29 PM
Simon Garratt, on Sep 11 2009, 10:02 AM, said:
Having a slightly elevated level counters this effect.
Its not unusual for a great many systems to take up at least 1DkH per day without constant buffering, This has a knock on effect with pH stability allowing a wider and wider 24/7 drift rather than a consistant drift. Admitedly lagoons can be quite variable dependent on several factors, but the front reef and back reef areas arnt generally subject to such wide changes.
Its basically a case of accepting and countering the differences between small volume stability (our tanks) and large volume (the ocean).
^^^ Well put by Simon ^^^
Social D, on Sep 11 2009, 02:04 AM, said:
Tim,
We all know anything mechanical will fail, at some point.
I assume you're running a CA reactor? Considering you're running at 7dkh, what would happen if the re-circulation pump failed? Or the water input pipe blocked? Imagine if this happened when you were away for the weekend. With a Dkh of just 7 there is very little reserve in the system - this is why I run my Dkh around 10-11
Tony
#13
Posted 11 September 2009 - 02:21 PM
#14
Posted 11 September 2009 - 02:35 PM
Tony B, on Sep 11 2009, 02:29 PM, said:
Tim,
We all know anything mechanical will fail, at some point.
I assume you're running a CA reactor? Considering you're running at 7dkh, what would happen if the re-circulation pump failed? Or the water input pipe blocked? Imagine if this happened when you were away for the weekend. With a Dkh of just 7 there is very little reserve in the system - this is why I run my Dkh around 10-11
Tony
I inadvertently left the CO2 turned off on my Reactor and the DKH fell from 10.6 to 8 overnight.
#15
Posted 11 September 2009 - 02:57 PM
#16
Posted 11 September 2009 - 04:25 PM
A vodka overdose would show cyano and possibly milky water but wouldnt normaly cause die back in my experience.
Dave
#17
Posted 11 September 2009 - 07:10 PM
jas
#18
Posted 12 September 2009 - 12:09 AM

Help
























